One Million Homeless?

From the Associated Press wire here at ABC 33/40...

When Hurricane Katrina hits New Orleans on Monday, it could turn one of America's most charming cities into a vast cesspool tainted with toxic chemicals, human waste and even coffins released by floodwaters from the city's legendary cemeteries.

Experts have warned for years that the levees and pumps that usually keep New Orleans dry have no chance against a direct hit by a Category 5 storm.

That's exactly what Katrina was as it churned toward the city. With top winds of 165 mph and the power to lift sea level by as much as 28 feet above normal, the storm threatened an environmental disaster of biblical proportions, one that could leave more than 1 million people homeless.

"All indications are that this is absolutely worst-case scenario," Ivor van Heerden, deputy director of the Louisiana State University Hurricane Center, said Sunday afternoon.

The center's latest computer simulations indicate that by Tuesday, vast swaths of New Orleans could be under water up to 30 feet deep. In the French Quarter, the water could reach 20 feet, easily submerging the district's iconic cast-iron balconies and bars.

Estimates predict that 60 percent to 80 percent of the city's houses will be destroyed by wind. With the flood damage, most of the people who live in and around New Orleans could be homeless.

"We're talking about in essence having _ in the continental United States _ having a refugee camp of a million people," van Heerden said.

Aside from Hurricane Andrew, which struck Miami in 1992, forecasters have no experience with Category 5 hurricanes hitting densely populated areas.

"Hurricanes rarely sustain such extreme winds for much time. However we see no obvious large-scale effects to cause a substantial weakening the system and it is expected that the hurricane will be of Category 4 or 5 intensity when it reaches the coast," National Hurricane Center meteorologist Richard Pasch said.

As they raced to put meteorological instruments in Katrina's path Sunday, wind engineers had little idea what their equipment would record.

"We haven't seen something this big since we started the program," said Kurt Gurley, a University of Florida engineering professor. He works for the Florida Coastal Monitoring Program, which is in its seventh year of making detailed measurements of hurricane wind conditions using a set of mobile weather stations.

Experts have warned about New Orleans' vulnerability for years, chiefly because Louisiana has lost more than a million acres of coastal wetlands in the past seven decades. The vast patchwork of swamps and bayous south of the city serves as a buffer, partially absorbing the surge of water that a hurricane pushes ashore.

Experts have also warned that the ring of high levees around New Orleans, designed to protect the city from floodwaters coming down the Mississippi, will only make things worse in a powerful hurricane. Katrina is expected to push a 28-foot storm surge against the levees. Even if they hold, water will pour over their tops and begin filling the city as if it were a sinking canoe.

After the storm passes, the water will have nowhere to go.

In a few days, van Heerden predicts, emergency management officials are going to be wondering how to handle a giant stagnant pond contaminated with building debris, coffins, sewage and other hazardous materials.

"We're talking about an incredible environmental disaster," van Heerden said.

He puts much of the blame for New Orleans' dire situation on the very levee system that is designed to protect southern Louisiana from Mississippi River floods.

Before the levees were built, the river would top its banks during floods and wash through a maze of bayous and swamps, dropping fine- grained silt that nourished plants and kept the land just above sea level.

The levees "have literally starved our wetlands to death" by directing all of that precious silt out into the Gulf of Mexico, van Heerden said.

It has been 40 years since New Orleans faced a hurricane even comparable to Katrina. In 1965, Hurricane Betsy, a Category 3 storm, submerged some parts of the city to a depth of seven feet.

Since then, the Big Easy has had nothing but near misses. In 1998, Hurricane Georges headed straight for New Orleans, then swerved at the last minute to strike Mississippi and Alabama. Hurricane Lili blew herself out at the mouth of the Mississippi in 2002. And last year's Hurricane Ivan obligingly curved to the east as it came ashore, barely grazing a grateful city.
Posted by Greg  
on August 28, 2005, 8:20 pm
Winds are down to 140. ITs a bust

Reply to this comment
Posted by al911dispatcher  
on August 28, 2005, 8:26 pm
it could stregthen again. still several hours from landfall. 140 mph is nothing to sneeze at.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:31 pm
Greg, have you ever experienced 140 mph winds sustained over a period of time? Trust me, the sound alone is enough to drive one mad. The destruction is horrible. I would hardly call 140 mph a bust.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:25 pm
Somehow I don't see winds of 140 mph as a bust. I doubt most of New Orleans would either.

One question, if she keeps churning north as she appears to be (and is forecast to), wouldn't NO be on the west side? The damage will still be severe, no doubt, but if they miss a "direct hit" from the east side of the storm, will the apocolyptic predictions be for naught?

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:28 pm
Where did you get your information Greg? I can't find ANYTHING about the winds being dropped to 140 mph.

Reply to this comment
Posted by Greg  
on August 28, 2005, 8:29 pm
Damage will be about as bad as IVAN. It will be down to 120 before landfall? Bet on it

Reply to this comment
Posted by Chip  
on August 28, 2005, 8:31 pm
Still seeing 160 from every source...

Reply to this comment
Posted by Greg  
on August 28, 2005, 8:30 pm
NWS Hurricane Hunters

Reply to this comment
Posted by Brandon  
on August 28, 2005, 8:30 pm
The 10:00 update keeps it at 160mph still a cat 5. Not sure what report Greg is reading, but I cannot find it either.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:33 pm
Well Greg, 160 compared to 140 is like saying I would rather crash my car into a wall at 140 rather than 160, same effect........

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:34 pm
Off topic, but any word on school closings for Monday in the Birmingham area?

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:34 pm
Care to post or link to that vortex message then Greg? Any info we have would be greatly appreciated.....

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:35 pm
I just heard on the news that even if the eye passes east of NO, that they actually is worse for NO because the winds would kick the water more out of Lake P. and flood NO even more.

I am not a weather person but that's the gist of what I just heard.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:36 pm
Weather man on Fox 6 is saying no widespread damage in West Alabama.......Never bet on a horse he picks.....

Reply to this comment
Posted by weatherbug  
on August 28, 2005, 8:38 pm
thats the same weatherman that had that affair with the anchor isn't he? yeah, I trust him.

Reply to this comment
Posted by Brandon  
on August 28, 2005, 8:38 pm
Good point, but it would not be 20-30 feet like it will be from the Gulf. It would spell alot better for the city if it passed east of there as far as storm surge is concerned, but they will sustain massive wind damage. Yes the lake will still spill into the city but its doubtful it will be as bad if it does that.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:39 pm
I agree with Andy. And so does this guy, quoted on CNN's website:
"National Hurricane Center Director Max Mayfield said: "There's certainly a chance it can weaken a bit before it gets to the coast, but unfortunately this is so large and so powerful that it's a little bit like the difference between being run over by an 18-wheeler or a freight train. Neither prospect is good."

Amen. Let's pray for the best!

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:39 pm
Didn't know about the affair.......Hmmmmm

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:46 pm
The wind reading was probably 140 knots instead of 140 mph. 140 knots = 160 mph.

Reply to this comment
Posted by Greg  
on August 28, 2005, 8:43 pm
Just wait until the the 10pm update. MB pressure will be up. NO will only see 100-120mph winds

Reply to this comment
Posted by Chip  
on August 28, 2005, 8:46 pm
Update coming out. Winds at 160. Still moving nnw.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:47 pm
If that's the case, why can't you back up your claims with data..... you said it was from Hurricane Hunters..... their reports are issued in Vortex Messages.......why don't we have one with the new changes?

There's no use in trying to get people to believe false data, just so you can bash forecasters for overhyped systems earlier in the season. Any halfway knowledgeable weather weenie would go to look for him/herself....... you can't fool anyone.... even if you could, what's the use....

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 28, 2005, 8:51 pm
http://www.srh.noaa.gov/data/NHC/TCDAT2

being kept a Cat 5 for know...... 140 kts....... BIG DIFFERENCE from 140 mph

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on August 30, 2005, 6:21 pm
Adopt A Family
Millions of people are homeless due to Hurricane Katrina. Some had insurance to cover loss many did not. Renters in the effect area have lost everything. We are offering a room in our home to help an individual or a small family. I urge others to do the same. Please help us to spread the word and to help others.
Sincerely
Linda Duggins

Reply to this comment