2006 Hurricane Season Outlook

One of the best tropical weather experts in the world, Dr. William Gray from Colorado State University, issued his outlook for the 2006 hurricane season yesterday. The 2005 season just ended last week, and oddly enough we still have a hurricane in the eastern Atlantic here in early December, Epsilon. But, for the U.S. mainland the season is over for sure with cool sea water temperatures near the coast. Here is an excerpt from Dr. Gray’s outlook:

Information obtained through November 2005 indicates that the 2006 Atlantic hurricane season will be much more active than the average 1950-2000 season. We estimate that 2006 will have about 9 hurricanes (average is 5.9), 17 named storms (average is 9.6), 85 named storm days (average is 49.1), 45 hurricane days (average is 24.5), 5 intense (Category 3-4-5) hurricanes (average is 2.3) and 13 intense hurricane days (average is 5.0). The probability of U.S. major hurricane landfall is estimated to be about 55 percent above the long-period average.

We expect Atlantic basin Net Tropical Cyclone (NTC) activity in 2006 to be about 195 percent of the long-term average. This forecast is based on our recently developed 6-11 month extended range statistical forecast procedure which utilizes 52 years of past data. These include five selective measures of September-November North Atlantic and Pacific surface pressure and 500 mb height fields and a measure of the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO). All predictors are calling for an active season. Analog predictors have also been utilized.

The influences of El Niño conditions are implicit in these predictor fields, and therefore we do not utilize a specific ENSO forecast as a predictor. We do not expect El Niño conditions during the 2006 season. It is more likely that neutral or even La Niña conditions will develop.
Posted by Greg  
on December 6, 2005, 10:15 pm
James, Why do you keeping blowing the forcast on snow. We know the GFS is awful at forcasting more than 96 hours out, so why try??

Reply to this comment
Posted by Perry aka "SouthernWx"  
on December 7, 2005, 1:06 am
Greg, why don't you learn to interpret model guidance and climatology and begin creating your own weather forecasts.....instead of relying on someone else?

I've never been to college a day in my life......but am more competent and accurate than most pro meteorologists I've seen on Atlanta tv or met online; and the reasons why?

1) I began dedicated research into weather forecasting and storms at age twelve; 31 years ago....

2) I conducted my research with a passion; wanted to know EVERYTHING....wanted to know why a storm occurred...and how to spot the atmospheric ingrediants coming together to spawn storms in the future....

3) Instead of coming on forums/ blogs, etc and belittling/ harrassing pro's such as Mr Spann....I instead read their posts; learned many tricks of the trade I didn't know before coming online. I was a pretty good amateur forecaster in 1999....but after learning about model bias's and how to properly interpret model data AND combine it with what I already knew about the atmosphere, climatology.....today I'm an extremely accurate and reliable forecaster. That's why I know Thursday will likely be a cold, wet and raw winter day in Atlanta, GA.....but we won't witness an ice storm or snowflakes flying.

Just my 0.02 cents worth...

Perry



Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on December 6, 2005, 10:50 pm
Greg, Dont take this wrong..Im not trying to be critical, but when has james actually forcasted snow for our area?? He secificly states that anything beyond say 4 to 5 days is voodoo land, and not a forcast.. Let me ask you this.. Why do people analyze the stock market?? Why so peple analyze anything?? We sure cant predict the economy, just as we cant predict the specifics of weather.. its done to try and find trends... When we find trends , we can become better prepared in the even we do get specific weather in here.. We all know that the weather models are very inacurate, but you know what ... We like doing it.. People every day talk about what Alabama, or Auburn will do next year... Its done for fun..Because who would have predicted that Alabama would have a chance at a 10 win season this year?? No One that in thinking clearly... So the final question is... WHy do you have to come in here and bust on James for doing his job.. ??

Reply to this comment
Posted by Greg  
on December 6, 2005, 11:23 pm
Because James had snow flurries in his forcast for Thursday/Friday and he was wrong... again .. 2nd time this season. >>> And you know what, he has the wintry mix for culman north. I guarantee you that Huntsville will NOT get a wintry mix. Sure 1000 feet plus may see some action because of the 3 degree differential, but that is a no brainer. Let be honest here and have a reality check. We all would be better off with our stress level if we just paid attention to weatherunderground.com (NWS). Its FAAAARR more acurate . I will say this... it is fun to watch James let us know of trends in the future though so we know if we should expect 30's for highs or 60's. TOO MUCH VOODOO!! Ill still watch James , but this year I am going to rely on the the National Weather Service

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on December 7, 2005, 12:56 am
I enjoy watching the trends. And what better place than this weather blog for such information that is not usually the part of any official 'forecast.' Seeing the possibilities that weathermen (everywhere, not just James) have to analyze and turn into a forecast is pretty interesting.

As for the reliability of the NWS, they, too, forecasted (this past weekend) a rain/snow evemt for this coming Thursday in the Huntsville Area, then it changed quickly. The NWS in Hunstville (posting in a 'special weather statement' on weather.com) also called for a wintry mix/snow flurries this past Monday morning that never materialized, either. So much for being far more accurate...

I like the "voodoo." If not accurate enough to become a forecast, it at the very least gives us the insider tips into the makings of a forecast...and I can now appreciate why official forecasts from the NWS, ABC33/40, and others are constantly changing. I also have a new appreciation for meteorologists facing the sometimes daunting task of analyzing all this data and giving us - the viewers - a forecast that doesn't disappoint.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on December 7, 2005, 1:16 am
Hey Greg....if you can do any better, then go for it.
It takes a lot of guts to post a public forecast online (or on tv/radio) as James does every day; it takes absolutely NO intestinal fortitude to go on THEIR personal wx blog and harrass them about it.

You folks of today are SO FRIGGIN fortunate; when I was a teenager/ young adult.....I'd have sold my soul for the chance to discuss weather with men such as James Spann, JB Elliott, and Brian Peters on a daily basis; the chance to read their thoughts and maybe learn a few things. I'd never have used their forum or blog to pester them.....NO WAY!!!!

PW





Reply to this comment
Posted by Joe  
on December 7, 2005, 5:36 am
Hmm...

NWS forecast for Monday (from last week)

Sunny, high 55

ABC 33/40 forecast (from last week):

Clouds and Drizzle, low 40s, some places wont get out of the upper 30s

Verification:
Clouds and Drizzle, high 42

Greg, shhhhh. You are confusing the blog speculation with the 7 day forecast. Check your facts before you criticize.. they will admit when they are wrong... but the person wrong in this case has a name that starts with "Gr" and ends with "eg"

Reply to this comment
Posted by Greg  
on December 7, 2005, 8:19 am
No Snow. So whatever kids. Have fun with stressing yourself. Why dont you post where the NWS said ( and within 96 hours ) that it would be highs in the 50's on Monday. And also post where it was verified.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on December 7, 2005, 8:43 am
Grg, God bless you , we are not stressed..... We are here, having a good time...You come in and start trying to crack on everyone... This is a BLOG.... A Chatroom... Not the Forcasting room.... We dont stress, as a matter of fact, James doesnt even post in here... well not often... but he lets us have fun...Many of us post our thoughts...And even when they are wrong..And mine generally are genreally way off the mark, but hey ... Thats why we are in a chatroom.... So lighten up , grab some chilli and have some fun

Reply to this comment
Posted by Jason  
on December 7, 2005, 8:56 am
Just let greg make a fool of himself. He obviously doesn't know much about the weather which is ok but, to act like you know something about it when you really don't and complain to get attention from the blog is childish. There is really no sense in replying to him unless he actualy has a question where he want's to learn something.

BTW Very heavy frost here in Cheokee County too. I fed the dogs last night at about 10:00 and there was already frost on the ground .

Reply to this comment
Posted by John T.  
on December 7, 2005, 8:36 pm
Greg if you don't like what you read why do you? Do you make mistakes are you perfect? The only one stressing out is you. I still want the people like you to prove where Mr. Spann has predicted snow (not snow flurries). Do you not read the updates? The wintry mix was moved to the AL/TN line. READ & LOOK OFTEN before you speak. Go to weatherunderground & chill out.

Reply to this comment