What, Me Worry?

Oh boy.

The cover of Time Magazine in bold letters says:” Be Worried. Be VERY Worried”.

The story? “Global warming”, of course. The darling of the media these days.

Time’s Jeffrey Kluger proclaims: “No one can say exactly what it looks like when a planet takes ill, but it probably looks a lot like Earth. Never mind what you've heard about global warming as a slow-motion emergency that would take decades to play out. Suddenly and unexpectedly, the crisis is upon us.”

He goes on to report: “Environmentalists and lawmakers spent years shouting at one another about whether the grim forecasts were true, but in the past five years or so, the serious debate has quietly ended. Global warming, even most skeptics have concluded, is the real deal, and human activity has been causing it. “

Maybe Mr. Kluger needed to watch our special this past Sunday night. Our own Brian Peters interview Dr. John Christy, the Alabama State Climatologist, who spoke the truth about “global warming”. It is the truth the nation media continues to ignore. Dr. Christy has done countless hours of research on this issue using satellite data, and has concluded that there has been slight warming in recent years, explained by the cyclic nature of our climate. He attributes the national media hysteria to flawed computer models that are simply wrong about future warming trends globally.

We must remember that good weather records go back to 1880… that is a tiny slice of time considering how long this planet has been around. Trying to prove long term climate change with such a tiny amount of data is just about impossible. Yes, the issue needs research and study, but the politics need to be taken out of the equation. And, quite frankly, journalists are not qualified to be climatologists. I suggest they stay out of the mix as well!
Posted by John T.  
on March 27, 2006, 10:21 pm
I agree James . Seams they do not want to interview the experts that will give them the truth . The problem with these journalists , or alot of them , is that the truth will not sale as well , and make them famous for the untruthfull panic & maham that they get out of the people that will believe anything .

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on March 27, 2006, 11:40 pm
I finished reading Jurrasic Park author Michael Crichton's "State of Fear" a couple of months ago. It's a fascinating read centered around the global warming issue and the phenomenon of how everyone "just knows" that global warming is a problem.

Though the book's plot is adventurous fiction, Crichton points out in his preface that the research articles he quotes and the arguments that follow throughout the story are grounded in actual scientific results that, if anything, corroborate exactly what James said above. Very eye-opening to the real nature of the issue.

The "State of Fear" Crichton refers to is the near panic-state that people in the population develop as they slowly and mindlessly absorb things popularized by politicians, the media, and even celebrities. One huge past 'state of fear' is the "Red Scare" (communism) that caused people to build bomb shelters and and do bizarre things like root out potential communits in Hollywood or other circles.

When it comes to global warming, people have blindly accepted the 'threat' as it is deliberately perpetuated by politicians, the media, and scientists making global generalizations about our climate based on regional, cyclical, or inconclusive data. Over time, fear sets in. Fear that moves people to make quick, rash decisions. Fear that overrides the truth. Sure, we should be environmentally responsible, but even knowing how to do that takes research.

When I saw that Time headline, "Be worried. Be VERY worried," the warning sirens went off in my head alerting me not to let a headline scare me without knowing all the facts or blindly accepting the cited facts in such an article.

Reply to this comment
Posted by   www
on March 27, 2006, 10:21 pm
I agree with you 100%, James.

Reply to this comment
Posted by John T.  
on March 27, 2006, 10:30 pm
OH , while its on my mind & that I'm watch the sports , CONGRADUALTIONS to Mike Raita , Chris Tatum , Brian Wallace and ALL the 3340 people that got their well-deserved awards of the weakend . Proud of you all ! ( sorry for this not being wx related but it is related the abc3340 news though , could not help but to say )

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on March 28, 2006, 8:52 am
I read this article and several others about the runaway global-warming trend. The writers are quite convincing, and one of the articles seemed to stay away from the politics, until the writer implied that we can "do something" to stop this seemingly irreversible doomsday ice-melting trend.

But these writers are contradicting themselves, because if you believe what they are saying about how the trend is accelerating, our chances of slowing things down look hopeless. Even if everyone on Earth parked their cars and rode bicycles to work, how could that stop this supposedly self-perpetuating trend of the melting sheet ice? According to the articles, the more ice that melts, the less energy is reflected to space, so the melting accelerates, etc. If this is happening right now, how can anything stop it? The writers offer no real solution.

I have to wonder whether the people who were around for the last ice age could have done anything to prevent it. James is right about the tiny slice of time for which we have accurate weather records; in the context of geologic time, these records are meaningless.

It's too bad that politics has to get in the way of telling the truth, but that is the way it is with the news media these days; in this case, we're either all doomed to live on a superheated, out-of-control planet unless we vote a certain way, or there is absolutely no need to reduce pollution as long as we vote a certain way.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on March 28, 2006, 11:06 am
So is global warning going to be like that movie day after tom.?

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on March 28, 2006, 1:25 pm
I hope that you people that are skeptical about the fear tactics that are used in respect to global warming are just as skeptical of the fear tactics that Cheney and Bush use to justify their actions.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on March 28, 2006, 3:48 pm
I think it's important not to accept anything without learning the facts for yourselves.

Whether it's about global warming or the war on terror, it's important to look beyond the big statements politicians and the media makes about things. Otherwise, we just have a 'fear response' that guides our actions...made all the much more dangerous when great numbers of people get together with the same fear.

Unfortunately, I don't think many people have the patience to form a 'informed' opinion and learn all the perspectives on an issue. Mix in a little fear, political motives/perspectives/party ties, and social pressure to follow the consensus, then it's easy to quickly jump on one side of an issue never even knowing the alternatives. And I think this is why this whole global warming thing can incite so much hype and make the headline of Time Magazine with the phrase "Be Very Worried" glaring at you.

But not jumping on the 'hype wagon' doesn't mean we shouldn't care. Not taking care of our environment might have results that could be problematic or catastrophic. It doesn't have to be global. Even the ozone pollution that happens in B'ham in the heart of summer, though not necessarily 'catastrophic,' is certainly a nuisance and surprises me how much the bad air quality 'zaps' the energy out of me. So, we should be environmentally conscientious and do what we can to help it.

Reply to this comment
Posted by  
on March 28, 2006, 3:17 pm
I listened to Dr. Christy's interview on NPR. He said he expects the temperature to rise another 1-1.5 degrees celsius over the next hundred years. Any ideas on how that will affect the planet? I tend to agree that it is too late to do anything at this point. I don't think people in this country will do anything significant until something drastic happens, if it ever does. And if it ever does, it will be too late.

Expectations are that the world, especially China, will burn coal at a much higher rate over the next several decades. Do Dr. Christy's predictions account for that or other future changes that may occur?

I agree that arguments from both sides are politically motivated. The Time Magazine article is alarmist to say the least. And many on the right either deny global warming exists, or if they acknowledge that it does exist, they say it won't have significant impacts. We have an administration headed by two former oil men. I don't think they care about global warming or it's impacts, or whether it's happening or not. And that filters down through the media to the brains of the American people. Including scientists.

Personally, I think the truth lies somewhere in the middle. It's obvious at this point that global warming is occurring and will continue to occur. Dr. Christy says that. Global warming isn't a hoax. I think there will be significant impacts. The big question is how significant will those impacts be. At this point, I don't have any confidence that Dr. Christy or any other scientist can predict that with any degree of accuracy.

Am I wrong, or isn't it true that just a change of a few degrees one way or the other can mean the difference between an ice age (or a mini-ice age) and the ice caps melting? If that's wrong, please let me know, and let me know why.

Thanks

Dave



Reply to this comment